|
Post by Kirstyyy; on Sept 14, 2004 13:30:40 GMT -5
My God how is that a valid point?! u cant use something from a random movie and make a comparrison with the point i made cuz as anyone with half a brain knows there is no connection to ghost busters and marshall looking at corrines picture. now in reality im pretty sure that not everyone stares at EVERY single picture they develop. As im sure we both know there many different reasons why marshall could have been staring at the pic. he could have been looking at tthe background, he could have been admiring in her hair, he could have been thinking that he thought he saw something up her nose for all i care! but the fact remains that u have to admit its more likely he was asked by the director to stare at the pic a bit to encourage the idea and rise suspision from the audience of him liking Corrine rather than to show the auidence how much of a precise and professional and experiesed photogragher he is. yeah i agree with that but you never know maybe gouki is right but hey my opinion
|
|
|
Post by prettyinpink12 on Sept 14, 2004 17:37:37 GMT -5
yeah i agree with that but you never know maybe gouki is right but hey my opinion I dont get your answer? You said that you agreed with Gisse, but then you said that Gouki may be right?! But they are on total different standings with the matter....Im confused....
|
|
|
Post by Gouki on Sept 14, 2004 18:15:08 GMT -5
My God how is that a valid point?! u cant use something from a random movie and make a comparrison with the point i made cuz as anyone with half a brain knows there is no connection to ghost busters and marshall looking at corrines picture. Oay, I never once said that Ghostbusters II had anything to do with BHH. I was using it as a comparison as it had photoography, that is all. do you want other examples of pop-culture photgraphy? You'd be surprised, as long as it's a good phot you have to make sure it is fine. First problem: You're mentioning the director. there is no director in the world of BHH. That cheapens the debate and is similar to ending a Buffy debate with "well, Vampires don't exist anyway." we are discussing the characters. Not the reality intentions of the director or the writer or the actor this is about Marshall and Corrine not Noah and Shadia. You haev to take that into consideration. That is the purpose of the debate. Accpeting everything at face value will cause some problems for you, as it already has. It seems.
|
|
|
Post by MirrorCard on Sept 14, 2004 19:34:23 GMT -5
First problem: You're mentioning the director. there is no director in the world of BHH. yes there is. maybe i don't quite understand what you're talking about. oh my gosh, we're still on the pictures? people, face it, this C+M arguement is shaky at best.
|
|
|
Post by Gouki on Sept 14, 2004 23:00:16 GMT -5
yes there is. maybe i don't quite understand what you're talking about It's a debate. About Marshall and Corrines relationships. The director might have told Noah to look at the photo. But not Marshall. You see? There is no director to tell the characters what to do. They tell the actors. And that snot what we're talking about. We're talking about the characters.
|
|
Gisse
New Member
Posts: 33
|
Post by Gisse on Sept 15, 2004 9:23:04 GMT -5
First problem: You're mentioning the director. there is no director in the world of BHH. That cheapens the debate and is similar to ending a Buffy debate with "well, Vampires don't exist anyway." we are discussing the characters. Not the reality intentions of the director or the writer or the actor this is about Marshall and Corrine not Noah and Shadia. You haev to take that into consideration. That is the purpose of the debate. Accpeting everything at face value will cause some problems for you, as it already has. It seems. It's a debate. About Marshall and Corrines relationships. The director might have told Noah to look at the photo. But not Marshall. You see? There is no director to tell the characters what to do. They tell the actors. And that snot what we're talking about. We're talking about the characters. ok soory i see where i have gone wrong....i made the mistake of distinguisghing that BHH is fiction and that Marshall is a character TOLD what to do by a director which obviously is completely un-nessasry for what ure saying as in ure arguement marshall is real. so i rest my case as im looking at this in a realistic ("face value")way and u most defintely are not so theres no point in participatiing in the debate but for those of you who DO see marshall's actions as what Noah has been told to do by the director and understand he's not a REAL person, my argument saying that; there are many reasons the directr could have told "Marshall" to look at the photo but its more likely he was asked by the director to stare at the pic a bit to encourage the idea and rise suspision from the audience of him liking Corrine rather than to show the auidence how much of a precise and professional and experiesed photogragher he is, still stands.
|
|
|
Post by Gouki on Sept 15, 2004 16:07:17 GMT -5
You're really not grasping the deabte of a fictional world, are you? *shrugs* Not my problem--as I now resign myself from this thread.
|
|
Gisse
New Member
Posts: 33
|
Post by Gisse on Sept 15, 2004 16:50:35 GMT -5
lol i was tryin to explain that i see we're ure comin from cuz for this particular argument u were lookin at it from the fictional side where as i thought it was a debate lookin atboth sides. it was just a mis understandin cuz we both thought we were seeing things froma diff point of view. trust me i understand the fic side, i just made a few of my points sed on the reality side **Gisse, dear, could you please cut down on the netspeak a bit? It makes your posts kind of hard to read Using English would also make your arguments seem to have more weight (people rarely take the opinions of netspeakers seriously as the general mentality is 'if this person can't even use capitals, full stops and standard spelling, how can they discuss things intelligently'). - Hail**
|
|
|
Post by Gouki on Sept 16, 2004 8:31:08 GMT -5
Oh. I... see. Well then, I still am not being involved in the argument anymore, but, I'm glad we got that part sorted out.
|
|
Gisse
New Member
Posts: 33
|
Post by Gisse on Sept 18, 2004 12:42:24 GMT -5
Ok fair enough, at least we both understand eachother now and have cleared it up.
|
|
|
Post by ilovebhh on Mar 22, 2006 14:32:10 GMT -5
Marshall.... Corrine.... NO WAY
|
|
|
Post by Gouki on Mar 23, 2006 3:49:01 GMT -5
Wow.
Die now please.
|
|
|
Post by HailStorm on Mar 23, 2006 5:44:38 GMT -5
*sigh* Okay, for any newbies in the area here is the deal: There's this thing called time, right, and it passes by ever so swiftly like a train in the night. Now, one way we measure time is days, another is months and another is years. This thread was started 2 years and 5 months ago. It was last posted in 1 year and 6 months ago. In the case of pure C/M debate, yes, it is better to bring back a thread such as this than start a new one. However, it is only okay to bring it back if you have something useful, intelligent, coherent and NEW to say. If you want to bring back an old debate thread remember: Read throught the entire thread (if possible - most threads aren't that long) quickly and see if somebody has already said what you want to say. If they have then either don't say it or put an exciting new spin on it, look at it from a different angle. Also, if you say anything, remember to back it up with reasons/evidence or elaborate on it. Do NOT bring back an ancient thread and just say 'I like it' or 'I don't like it'. It's boring and it makes us feel physically sick. Now seeing as you've brought this thread back, little fangirl, do something useful and interesting. I want an essay about C/M assessing evidence for and against, positive factors and criticisms and finally a small section on why you personally do not like it. it must be at least 700 words and I want it done within two weeks? Don't want to do it? Then kindly shut up and stop excavating and spamming.
|
|