|
Post by HailStorm on May 21, 2004 16:42:33 GMT -5
That would be Wormhole, I believe
|
|
|
Post by smogemogirl323 on May 21, 2004 17:17:25 GMT -5
i think , josie mom's and Z know more about Peradyne remember guys: in wormole 2 we saw kelly work at pearadyne in who z confess that he work in a tage for victor. hum he was a spy. bhgirl
|
|
|
Post by Tommy on Jun 7, 2004 15:25:35 GMT -5
i think he used to know more than he's letting on but he's certainly not helping them now! He wouldn't? WOULD HE? *hides under sofa*
|
|
|
Post by Mac on Jun 14, 2004 22:49:56 GMT -5
I just saw Fate yesterday. Although he doesnt realize it when he first sees the Quigong balls, he has an interesting reaction the second time around:
Z: I had a Pearadyne scholorship... here's your ball back J: I lost the other one Z: Heh, ah well...........WHAT!?
my bet is when he was working at Paradyne, he knew about the Quigong ball, and it was now that he realized that it was actually Josie's trip to the past that gave Victor his ball. in other words, that he has no alterior motives.
lol, their explaination of the ball was real stupid. "the space around the ball lost its gravity"? that makes no sense, since gravity is related to the mass of the object, not the air around it. if it wanted no gravity, it would have to have no mass. but then it could have no acceleration either. stupid fake-science...
|
|
|
Post by MirrorCard on Jun 15, 2004 0:16:35 GMT -5
the space around the ball meaning the gravity of Earth being zero makes the weight of the ball zero but does not make the mass of the ball zero. Zero gravity does not make the acceleration of the ball zero. The weightless ball would be able to accelerate with the applied force.
|
|
|
Post by Mac on Jun 15, 2004 3:33:52 GMT -5
Fg = GmM1M2/R2 force of gravity equals gravity constant times mass 1 (earth) times mass 2 (ball) divided by distance between objects squared. for an object right on earth's surface, Fg = weight so, if Fg = 0, then something on the right side would have to be zero. Gm cant equal 0, its a constant. Earth cant have 0 mass, because then there wouldnt be an earth. if it were distance that were changing, the only way for the object to have 0 gravitational pull is if it were infinate distance from the center of the earth. therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the ball itself has either zero or extremely tiny mass. and yes, its possible for particles to have 0 mass, just look at photons. As for acceleration, its the basic Newton principal of F = ma. Force is equal to the mass times the acceleration. If you shift it around, it becomes a = f/m. if the ball had zero mass, then the denominator of that equation would be zero, and the whole thing would become undefined. Therefore, the only logical explaination for the Quigong ball is that it has really really small mass, small enough that the force of gravity on the ball (its weight) is practically negligable and it hovers due to the buoyant force of air pushing up on it. After all, F = ma. acceleration due to gravity is constant, but since the mass is so small, the force (aka weight) is so small. That would also explain the whole "conserves momentum" bit. j=p impulse equals momentum. that can be expanted to become f x t = mv force times time equals mass times velocity. say you push on the ball with your finger. you deliver a 5 newton force for half a second. that's an impulse of 2.5 Ns. If the mass is really small, it would result in a really high momentum. that in turn would result in a huge kinetic energy. KE = 1/2mv 2. Energy equals .5 times the mass times velocity squared. Sure, the mass would be really small, and then times that by 1/2. However, the proportionally high velocity would then be squared, becoming huge, and thus providing enormous energy. Remember that 5 newton push? If the ball weighed .0000005 kilograms, that would result in a velocity of 5000000 meters per second, and thus 6250000 joules of energy. That's like a mini atomic bomb right there, just by tapping it. Anyway, that's my theory on the Quigong ball. Dont you just love physics? **fixed the superscript. It was bugging me - MirrorCard.**
|
|
|
Post by HailStorm on Jun 15, 2004 6:52:45 GMT -5
I just saw Fate yesterday. Although he doesnt realize it when he first sees the Quigong balls, he has an interesting reaction the second time around: Z: I had a Pearadyne scholorship... here's your ball back J: I lost the other one Z: Heh, ah well...........WHAT!? my bet is when he was working at Paradyne, he knew about the Quigong ball, and it was now that he realized that it was actually Josie's trip to the past that gave Victor his ball. in other words, that he has no alterior motives. I've already said that (well, the first observation at least) here Erm. Not as such. I've always been more of a chemistry kind of person. And psychology is my ultimate favourite science. I'm skipping the long physiscsy post - it's too early in the day to make my head hurt.
|
|
|
Post by MirrorCard on Jun 15, 2004 13:50:49 GMT -5
I can't believe I understood what you said *lol* I don't remember seeing the force gravity equation before. wasn't that mentioned in Fate about the ball in motion? I wanted to say the conservation of momentum thing but since I didn't actually understand momentum or know what the conservation of momentum is (with the exception of the "conservation part," I hope). Glad I got you figuring that one out *heh heh* eh. I'm thrilled when I understand it, lets leave it at that
|
|
|
Post by Tommy on Aug 20, 2004 15:18:48 GMT -5
i think we've already mentioned him knowing the code to get into Pearadyne but other than that...
Since when do phone answerers wear lab coats? In 'Who' he's wearing a lab coat in that pic
|
|
|
Post by MirrorCard on Aug 21, 2004 0:07:43 GMT -5
Since when do phone answerers wear lab coats? In 'Who' he's wearing a lab coat in that pic perhaps it is a uniform thing *shrugs*.
|
|
|
Post by Tommy on Aug 24, 2004 4:20:49 GMT -5
yeah right.
Secrataries do NOT wear lab coats OR know secret codes
|
|
GirlInRed
New Member
Men are like wine: the older,the better!
Posts: 38
|
Post by GirlInRed on Aug 27, 2004 23:19:42 GMT -5
[Off topic but nasty thought- people have made joked about the Janitor being Josie's dad.... [including me shameful as it is] But what if it's Z!!!!!!] Neehhh, he's way too young to be Josie's father. and besides, he'd need to have red hair, wouldn't he? Because Josie's mom's a blonde
|
|
|
Post by Mac on Aug 27, 2004 23:27:13 GMT -5
Neehhh, he's way too young to be Josie's father. and besides, he'd need to have red hair, wouldn't he? Because Josie's mom's a blonde It doesnt really make sense how Josie's hair is red. Both red and blond are submissive traits. If Josie's mom has one red gene and one blond gene, it would be strawberry blond. Although if the dad has just one red gene, but not red hair, his kid can still have red hair.
|
|
|
Post by HailStorm on Aug 28, 2004 5:24:25 GMT -5
Unless Kelly's hair was red when she was younger but is blonde now (or she dyed it). I'm sure it can happen because my dad was naturally blonde as a young man but by the tie he was 30 it had gone brown (and now it's going grey XD)
I was just thinking, Z would have had to be very young when doing work experience at Pearadyne. I guess he shouldn't have been younger than 18 though because surely the deal happened just before he went to college. So Z must be about 33ish.
|
|
|
Post by Tommy on Oct 15, 2004 2:48:39 GMT -5
Josie dyed her hair...everyone knows Emma's hair is dyed. i just assumed Josie's was..... Anyway...strike what I said about Z being her dad...stupid theory.... I think.... I think he knows more than Victor would have liked him to know
|
|